Is victor frankenstein gay
Readers' new meanings for Frankenstein
The Magazine feature about the hidden meanings of Frankenstein provoked a huge response from readers, who weighed in with some of their own.
So it's a book about a mad scientist who creates a monster, right?
Not entirely. Since Mary Shelley wrote her novel 200 years ago, it has variously been interpreted as a comment on, among other things, slavery, race and post-natal depression.
In response to the Magazine feature about these different takes on the novel, readers have been having their say.
Here is a selection of their contributions.
1. I tend to read the novel as more of a warning of the dangers of failing to raise our children properly. As parents we all play the role of creator. If we abandon our creations, and fail to elevate them adequately, we the creators, will ultimately spend the price.
Max Thomas, Barnsley
2. The title subtitle of the novel entity "The Modern Prometheus" brings it well into the realms of the over-reaching and, crucially, male artistic force. The novel is Milton's fall without the female temptation, and with any women in the novel consigned to the sidelines. Instead we
Homosexuality in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Research Paper
Introduction
The Victorian period is characterized by the paradox of a grand opening in community as well as a tremendous constraint. It is known as the period of change and social advances and the period of severe regard for the traditions. Under the reign of Queen Victoria, the Industrial Revolution came of age, blossomed, and brought sweeping change across the country and the world. Life switched from a base primarily dictated by the land one owned to a social structure based on commerce and manufacturing (Greenblatt, 2005).
Get a custom explore paper on Homosexuality in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
Learn More
In this switch, people living in these changing times began to question the status quo creating a great deal of social upheaval. Social class structures started to break down, and women, too, began to doubt their allotted place in society.
However, at the matching time, these breaks from the traditions incited a response reaction in favor of more traditional social roles in other areas, such as the refutation of male sexual relationships to the extent that one could be sentenced to death for participa
My curiosity about Frankenstein was confirmed when I left academia to become an activist. During this period, I entered therapy to deal with why I felt so persecuted inside, and was given an unpublished paper written in 1977 by Jungian-oriented psychologist Mitch Walker, “The Challenge of Frankenstein” (now posted on www.uranianpsych.org), that analyzed Frankenstein as a homosexual love story. Walker had an idea that an archetypal soul configuration—which he called the “double”—was at the heart of the felt human capacity for True Love and self-realization—but only if monstrous “competitor” qualities were consciously wrestled with in a process that eventually revealed this inner twin to be a magical phallic significant other and mediator between the ego-identity and the underworld of the psyche.
My growing sense that Frankenstein amounted to a canonical “gay” literary work on a par with Whitman’s Leaves of Grass and Oscar Wilde’s The Ballad of Reading Gaol was finally validated this year when I learned that homosexual historian John Lauritsen had published a new novel, The Man Who Wrote Frankenstein. Lauritsen is recognizable as a gay liberationist who co-authored, with David Thorstad, The Early Queer Rights
Nichole Currier
Robin DeRosa
Critical Theory
8 December 2015
The Secret Desires of Frankenstein
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is one of the most skillfully known works of gothic literature. The story revolves around Victor and his attempts, as well as successes, in creating a living creature. Through this journey, however, the reader is introduced to many other themes that are not so apparent on the surface level. One of these themes is that of homosexuality. Having been published in 1818, Frankenstein was written in a time when this was still an extremely controversial subject. Today, the idea is discussed openly. Douglas Sadownick addresses this theory in The Male Who Loved Frankenstein, where he discusses Frankenstein’s envy of female procreation as well as the finalize relationship he develops with Walton. Michael Eberle-Sinatra also explores this topic in Readings of Homosexuality in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Four Film Adaptations, where he discusses Victor’s affair with Elizabeth as successfully as her constant interest that Victor’s love resides in another. One can also cons
.